Unconscious Bias Theory in Employment Discrimination Litigation
نویسنده
چکیده
Deborah, an African American woman, worked as an administrative assistant for her employer for several years. She consistently received positive performance reviews until she came under the supervision of a new administrative director, Joan, who is white. One of only a handful of minority employees, Deborah became subjected to increased scrutiny by Joan, who singled her out by requiring her to document her use of time at work. Relations were strained between the two, culminating in Deborah’s termination for failure to meet with Joan to discuss her job responsibilities. Joan’s stated reason for terminating Deborah appears pretextual given that Deborah agreed to meet with her; because Deborah felt harassed, she had requested the presence of a supportive direct supervisor, a move recommended by the employee manual. Deborah has aled a Title VII race discrimination complaint against her employer in federal district court. Complaints of race discrimination against the employer have also been aled by at least two other minority employees.
منابع مشابه
No Intent , No Foul ?
Many commentators have criticized current anti-discrimination law on the grounds that it does not adequately prohibit unconscious bias in employment decisions. That claim is wrong: Unconscious bias is fully actionable, and it can generally be proved by knowledgeable employment lawyers. The idea behind unconscious bias is that well-meaning employers and supervisors, who would likely consider the...
متن کاملThe Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Structural Reform of the American Workplace
The role and effectiveness of large-scale employment discrimination litigation in combating workplace discrimination is a matter of ongoing dispute. In this paper we examine the remedies obtained by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in litigation filed over a ten-year period in order to compare actual outcomes in this important subset of employment discrimination litigatio...
متن کاملReverse Regression and Orthogonal Regression in Employment Discrimination Analysis
In a recent review article, White and Piette provide an overview of the use of reverse regressions in discrimination-related litigation. They explain the technique, provide a model application, summarize its advantages and disadvantages, and identify litigation in which it has been used. We point out weaknesses in common uses of reverse regression, some of which might cause serious misinterpret...
متن کاملDo Theories of Implicit Race Bias Change Moral Judgments?
Recent research in social psychology suggests that people harbor ‘‘implicit race biases,’’ biases which can be unconscious or uncontrollable. Because awareness and control have traditionally been deemed necessary for the ascription of moral responsibility, implicit biases present a unique challenge: do we pardon discrimination based on implicit biases because of its unintentional nature, or do ...
متن کاملThe War between Disparate Impact and Equal Protection
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids job discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.1 Title VII was originally enacted as a regulation of interstate commerce and applied only to private employers. In 1972, however, the Act was extended to the public sector pursuant to Congress’s Fourteenth Amendment authority to ensure that ‘‘[n]o State shall . . . deny ...
متن کامل